Gender and Manliness in Macbeth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v3i4.73Keywords:
Gender, manliness, monstrosity, male, female, society, role, hierarchyAbstract
Macbeth has remained one of the most fascinating works produced by Shakespeare which is why commentators have analyzed it from multiple dimensions. This paper analyzes the gender roles that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, and Macduff and Lady Macduff perform during the action of the play. It traces how the concept of manhood in the sixteenth century hierarchy of gender roles is challenged and defended by the mentioned couples respectively. Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth display a deviation from the gender roles already established in the then society. They defy the stereotypical gender roles between a dominant husband and a submissive wife which were quite common in medieval times. In contrast, Lady Macduff and Macduff reflect the established equation of gender roles as per the norms of the society they lived in. In the course of the play, the notion of manliness has been challenged, and reshaped throughout the action of the play; however, in the first part, it is mainly reduced to inhumaneness of character and blind aggression. The aggressive and inhuman ideals of masculinity are countered in the second half of the play with the focus shifting to Lord and Lady Macduff. The playwright shifts the audience’s attention to these two characters at a point when Lord and Lady Macbeth appear to fail in their “perverted” way of life. However, at the end of the play, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s faulty sense of gender expectations stops them from differentiating between manliness and monstrosity, which ultimately transforms them from becoming a worthy gentleman and honorable lady.
References
Adelman, Janet. "Born of Woman: Fantasies of Maternal Power in Macbeth." In Shakespearean Tragedy and Gender, ed. Garner, Shirley Nelson, and Madelon Sprengnether. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1996. pp.105-134. Print.
Berger, Harry, Jr. “Texts against Performance in Shakespeare.” In The Forms of Power and the Power of Forms. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. Genre15: 49-79. 1982. Print.
Bever, Edward. "Witchcraft, Female Aggression, and Power in the Early Modern Community." Journal of Social History. 2002. pp. 955-988.
Burnett, Mark Thornton. “The fiend-like Queen”: Rewriting Lady Macbeth.” Parergon 11.1: 1-19. Print.
Davis, Michael. “Courage and Impotence in Shakespeare’s Macbeth.” Sarah Lawrence Essays 4 (February) 7-29. 1979. Print.
Fawkner, Harald William. Deconstructing Macbeth: The Hyperontological View. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press, 1990. Print.
French, Marilyn. Shakespeare’s Division of Experience. New York: Ballentine Books. 1983. Print.
Jean E. Howard. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2008. 2579-2632. Print.
Kahn, Coppelia. Man’s Estate: Masculine Identity in Shakespeare. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1981. Print.
Kimbrough, Robert. “Macbeth as Prisoner of Gender.” Shakespeare Studies 16: pp. 175-90.1983. Print.
Klein, Joan Larsen. "Lady Macbeth: Infirm of Purpose." In The Woman's Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, ed. Lenz, Carolyn Ruth Swift, Gayle Greene, and Carol Thomas Neely. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1980. pp. 240-255. Print.
Ramsey, Jarold. “The Perversion of Manliness in Macbeth.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, Vol. 13, No. 2, Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (Spring, 1973), pp. 285-300
Shakespeare, William. "The Tragedy of Macbeth." The Norton Shakespeare, Based on the Oxford Edition. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Katharine Eisaman Maus
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





