Identifying Power Relations and Ideological Construction in Gender’s Language: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Pakistani Talk Shows

Authors

  • Sibgha Dilawer Research Scholar, Department of English, The Women University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Durr-e- Nayab Assistant Professor, Department of English, The Women University Multan, Punjab Pakistan.
  • Saima Rasheed Tareen Research Scholar, Department of English, The Women University Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v4i2.110

Keywords:

Language, Ideology, Power, Gender stereotypes, Talk shows

Abstract

With the proliferation of mass media culture in Pakistan, an extensive interest in talk shows can be witnessed with an increasing number of tv channels that are attaining a massive audience. These shows are most spectacular to epitomize the thoughts, ideologies and power relations of speakers. They not only shape the beliefs and perceptions of the common masses but also mold their pre-existing notions. Thus, this research endeavors to study the language sexism, gender stereotypes, power relations, and ideological construction in both men’s and women’s language in spoken discourse using Fairclough’s Three-dimensional model (1995, 2001), and Van Dijk’s Politics, Discourse and Ideology (2006). The data has been collected from three selected Pakistani Political talk shows by purposive sampling and analyzed qualitatively by using discourse analysis. The analysis unravels that both male and female politicians create negative ideologies by portraying negative-other-presentation with their lexical or syntactic choices and use informal language regardless of their age, gender and stature. Moreover, the findings disclose that women are audacious, assertive, and thunderous in exhibiting their opinions but men through their advising nature, elongated sentences and strategic dialogues strive to overpower the conversation. This research is significant as it creates awareness of lexical and syntactic choices made by both genders and divulges the constructed ideologies made through language. Future researchers can conduct comparative research on Pakistani and foreign talk shows to trace the power relation and ideological construction with the use of language. This study suggests that politicians and media houses must promote positive ideology and political awareness through their content.

References

Ahmed, R. (2010). Role of News Talk Shows in creating Political Efficacy among youth. Social and Cultural Studies.

Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003). Nice girls don't ask. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 14-14.

Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. London: Routledge

Bilal, H. A., Ahsan, H. M., Gohar, S., Younis, S., & Awan, S. J. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of political TV talk shows of Pakistani media. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 203.

Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, H. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey.

Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. Discourse as social interaction, 2, 206-230.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London, England: Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power. Person Education.

Fishman, P. M. (1980). conversational insecurity. In language (pp. 127-132). Pergamon.

Fowler, R., R. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Humm, M. (1989). The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Hertfordshire: Harvester.

Kleinman, S. (2002). Why sexist language matters. Qualitative sociology, 25(2), 299-304.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. Modern Languages, 15(1), 121-133.

Rahimi, A., & Sahragard, R. (2007). Critical discourse analysis. Tehran: Jungle Publications.

Simpson, J. (2009). A critical stance in language education: A reply to Alan Waters.

Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words, 312-343.

Talbot, M., M., Atkinson, K., & Atkinson, D. (2003). Language and Power in the modern world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.

Van Dijk (1997) Discourse as social interaction. Sage London.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, discourse and Ideology.

Van, Dijk, T. A (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton (eds). Malden: Blackwell. (pp352-371)

Widdowson, H. (2000). Critical practices: on representation and the interpretation of text. Discourse and social life, 102-120.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2008). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Sage Publication.

Yaseen, M., Mamdani, K. F., & Siddiqui, M. (2018). The role of political talk shows in raising political awareness among youth: A case study of University of Karachi. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 5(3), 90-108.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Dilawer, S. ., Nayab, D.- e-., & Tareen, S. R. . (2022). Identifying Power Relations and Ideological Construction in Gender’s Language: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Pakistani Talk Shows. Journal of Languages, Culture and Civilization, 4(2), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v4i2.110