Global Crisis and Online Education: A Study of Barriers within Online Tutoring in Covid-19

Authors

  • Saba Mohy-ud-Din Chishti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v2i1.45

Keywords:

Online education, Social Constructivism, Interaction, Issues

Abstract

The study seeks to investigate the tormenting dynamics which the students are facing nowadays in the form of online education during pandemic Covid-19. As the world is going through a deadly crisis, same is the case with the academic sector where the traditional classrooms are being shifted towards the online learning. The study explores the key argument that process of learning is social in nature which needs communication and association among the peers and their instructors. This process of interaction lacks in Online Classes hence affecting the quality of learning. The student’s anxieties and probable resolutions concerning the student views about virtual lessons bring into line with the Social Constructivist Theory and its learning models which make up the theoretical framework of the study. The students are fronting many issues in the form of either connectivity problems or technological crisis. The paper focuses upon all those problems which are faced by the students in the absence of traditional learning.

Therefore, the aim is to identify the issues related to online learning through the feedback captured by the students with the help of questionnaires. The study represents a mixed method approach where the conclusions are drawn through statistics and their qualitative analysis. The findings will also help to address the student’s concern towards online learning in a more effective way and efficient solutions to the problems can be drawn.

References

Abramenka, V. (2015). Students’ motivations and barriers to online education.

Adam, I. (2017). Vygotsky’s Social Constructivists Theory of Learning. Unpublished Research Paper.

Croft, N., Dalton, A., & Grant, M. (2010). Overcoming isolation in distance learning: Building a learning community through time and space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5(1), 27-64.

Doolittle, P.E., & Camp, W.G. (1999) Constructivism: The Career and Technical Education Perspective. Journal of Career and Technical Education, (16)1. http://dx.doi.org/10.21061/jcte.v16i1.706

Grundmann, O., Wielbo, D., & Tebbett, I. (2010). The implementation and growth of an international online forensic science graduate program at the university of florida. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(1), 34-40.

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30.

Hamat, A. F. E. N. D. I., & Embi, M. A. (2010). Constructivism in the design of online learning tools. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 237-246.

Kevin J. Downing, Tszfung Lam, Theresa Kwong, Wookyung Downing & Suiwah Chan (2007) Creating interaction in online learning: a case study, ALT-J, 15:3, 201-215.

Koohang, A. (2009). A learner-centered model for blended learning design. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), 76-91.

Lake D. (1999). Reducing isolation for distance students: An on-line initiative. Open Learning, 14 (3), 14-23.

Lin Y. Muilenberg, Z. L. (2005). Student Barriers to Online Learning: A Factor Analytic Study. Distance Education, 26, 29-48.

Liang, R. Y. H., & Chen, D. T. (2012). Online learning: Trends, potential and challenges.

Mbati, L. (2012). Online Learning for Social Constructivism: Creating a Conducive Environment.

McLeod, S. A. (2014). Lev Vygotsky

Morrison, D. (2014) Resources to Help Students Be Successful Online in Three Areas: Technical, Academic & Study Planning.

Nicholas Croft, Alice Dalton & Marcus Grant (2010) Overcoming Isolation in Distance Learning: Building a Learning Community through Time and Space, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5:1, 27-64, DOI: 10.11120/jebe.2010.05010027

Rogers J. (2001). Adults learning. 4th ed.Buckingham: OU Press.

Stacey E. (1999). Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education [online], 14 (2), 14-33.

Student?student?interaction refers?to?interaction?among?individual?students?or?among?

students?working?in?small?groups?(Moore,?1989).?In?correspondence?courses,?this?

interaction?is?often?absen

Student?student?interaction refers?to?interaction?among?individual?students?or?among?

students?working?in?small?groups?(Moore,?1989).?In?correspondence?courses,?this?

interaction?is?often?absen

Student?student?interaction refers?to?interaction?among?individual?students?or?among?

students?working?in?small?groups?(Moore,?1989).?In?correspondence?courses,?this?

interaction?is?often?absen

Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities, 6, 13-31.

Schunk, D. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Schell, G., & Janicki, T. J. (2013). Online course pedagogy and the constructivist learning model. Journal of the Southern Association for Information Systems, 1(1).

Secore, S. (2017). Social Constructivism in Online Learning: Andragogical Influence and the Effectual Educator. e-mentor, 70(3), 4-9.

Turuk, M. (2008). The Relevance and Implications of Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory in the Second Language Classroom. ARECLS, 5, 244-262.

Warden, C. A., Stanworth, J. O., Ren, J. B., & Warden, A. R. (2013). Synchronous learning best practices: An action research study. Computers & Education, 63, 197-207.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Chishti, S. M.- ud-D. . (2020). Global Crisis and Online Education: A Study of Barriers within Online Tutoring in Covid-19. Journal of Languages, Culture and Civilization, 2(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v2i1.45